Newsmax | Man Wins $50M in Suit Over Burns From Starbucks Tea

Newsmax | Man Wins $50M in Suit Over Burns From Starbucks Tea

Garcia’s lawyers said he required hospitalization and multiple skin grafts and has endured pain and dysfunction since the incident a little over five years ago.

Starbucks said it sympathized with Garcia but planned to appeal.

“We disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive,” the Seattle-based coffee giant said in a statement, adding that it was “committed to the highest safety standards” in handling hot drinks.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

View the entire article at Newsmax

Mens Journal | Starbucks Forks Over $50 Million to Customer With Scalded Genitals

Mens Journal | Starbucks Forks Over $50 Million to Customer With Scalded Genitals

 

Daily Mail |  Starbucks ordered to pay absurd amount

Daily Mail | Starbucks ordered to pay absurd amount

 

A California jury has ordered Starbucks to shell out $50 million to a delivery driver whose lap and genitals were scalded from hot drinks that spilled.

Michael Garcia, a driver for Postmates, went to a Starbucks drive-through in Los Angeles on February 8, 2020, to pick up three venti-sized ‘medicine ball’ hot teas, according to a lawsuit filed in California Superior Court.

One of the drinks a barista handed to him through the pickup window wasn’t securely in the tray, nor was the lid on all the way, according to the suit.

A California jury has ordered Starbucks to shell out $50 million to a delivery driver whose lap and genitals were scalded from hot drinks that spilled.

Michael Garcia, a driver for Postmates, went to a Starbucks drive-through in Los Angeles on February 8, 2020, to pick up three venti-sized ‘medicine ball’ hot teas, according to a lawsuit filed in California Superior Court.

One of the drinks a barista handed to him through the pickup window wasn’t securely in the tray, nor was the lid on all the way, according to the suit.

‘So, if I’m Starbucks and I hand you a drink that doesn’t have a lid that’s secured, and it’s a scalding hot, 180-degree drink, or if I hand you a drink that’s in a container and it’s loose and it’s not secured, and it falls right on you — the moment that I take my hands off of it, then you’re responsible and I, the corporation, am not,’ he said.

Garcia’s lawyers said he has had multiple surgeries for the permanent nerve damage and scars to his genitals.

They also say Garcia suffers from chronic pain every day and severe PTSD stemming from the life-changing incident.

‘Michael Garcia’s life has been forever changed,’ Rowley said in a statement after the verdict. 

‘No amount of money can undo the permanent catastrophic harm he has suffered, but this jury verdict is a critical step in holding Starbucks accountable for flagrant disregard for customer safety and failure to accept responsibility.’ 

Among the damages Garcia sought were physical pain, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, humiliation, inconvenience, grief, disfigurement, physical impairment, anxiety and emotional distress.

Jurors deliberated for about 40 minutes on Friday before siding with Garcia and handing him the eight-figure sum. 

Starbucks said it disagrees with the jury’s verdict and plans to pursue an appeal.

‘We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, but we disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive,’ a company spokesperson said in a statement. ‘

We have always been committed to the highest safety standards in our stores, including the handling of hot drinks.’ 

Generally, there is no cap on the amount of money juries can award plaintiffs in personal injury cases in California.

Proponents of having no caps say that it allows victims to be fairly compensated, while opponents say it can often lead to excessive rewards.

Garcia’s case is similar to a famous 1994 lawsuit against McDonald’s filed by a 79-year-old woman who spilled hot coffee into her lap and also suffered third-degree burns.

The plaintiff in that case, Stella Liebeck, was originally awarded $3 million by a jury, though the judge reduced that amount considerably.

Liebeck and McDonald’s appealed the decision and both parties settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Liebeck triggered a decades-long debate about whether her case necessitated tort reform in the United States. She died in August 2004 at age 91.

View the entire article at Daily Mail

New York Post | LA man wins $50M after Starbucks tea spilled on his lap

New York Post | LA man wins $50M after Starbucks tea spilled on his lap

 

Starbucks will have to fork over $50 million to a man whose genitals were severely burned after a hot tea spilled in his lap at a California drive-through.

Delivery driver Michael Garcia underwent skin grafts and other procedures after the fateful spill of the piping hot, venti-sized Starbucks beverage, which immediately fell onto his crotch area after he bought it on Feb. 8, 2020.

The resulting injuries were permanent and life changing, his attorneys said.

Garcia sued Starbucks and on Friday, a Los Angeles County jury decided in his favor, finding an employee of the Seattle-based coffee chain had not wedged the scalding hot drink into a takeout tray well enough before handing it over to him.

KBTX | Starbucks to pay $50 million to delivery driver burned by hot coffee

KBTX | Starbucks to pay $50 million to delivery driver burned by hot coffee

 

LOS ANGELES (CNN) – A jury in California has ordered Starbucks to pay $50 million to a delivery driver who was burned by hot coffee.

According to a lawsuit filed in 2020, Michael Garcia was picking up drinks at a drive-thru through in Los Angeles.

His lawyer says one of the drinks fell out of the container and onto Garcia, causing severe burns, disfigurement and debilitating nerve damage to his genitals.

The lawsuit accused Starbucks of breaching its duty of care by failing to secure the lid.

The coffee company plans to appeal the verdict.

This case is reminiscent of a famous 1994 lawsuit where a woman sued McDonald’s after suffering third-degree burns when hot coffee spilled onto her lap.

 

View the entire article at KBTX

CNN | Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to delivery driver burned by hot beverage

CNN | Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to delivery driver burned by hot beverage

New YorkCNN — A jury in California on Friday ordered Starbucks to pay $50 million in damages to a delivery driver who was severely burned by an improperly secured lid on hot beverages.

Michael Garcia was picking up drinks at a drive-through in Los Angeles when he “suffered severe burns, disfigurement, and debilitating nerve damage to his genitals when hot drinks ultimately spilled” onto his lap, according to the lawsuit filed in California Superior Court in 2020. The lawsuit accused Starbucks of breaching its duty of care by failing to secure the lid.

Michael Parker, Garcia’s lawyer, said his client was picking up three beverages and one of the hot drinks wasn’t fully pushed into the container. When the barista handed Garcia the order, a drink fell out of the container and onto Garcia, Parker said.

Garcia’s damages included physical pain, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, humiliation, inconvenience, grief, disfigurement, physical impairment, anxiety and emotional distress, according to a recording of the verdict from Courtroom View Network.

Starbucks said it plans to appeal the verdict.

“We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, but we disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive,” a company spokesperson said in a statement. “We have always been committed to the highest safety standards in our stores, including the handling of hot drinks.”

The lawsuit is reminiscent of a famous 1994 lawsuit against McDonald’s in which a woman spilled hot coffee on her lap and suffered third-degree burns. The plaintiff in that case, Stella Liebeck, was originally awarded nearly $3 million.

 

View the entire article at CNN