View the entire article at Long Beach Post
A Long Beach woman has won $21.3 million in a negligence lawsuit alleging she was left with a traumatic brain injury and chronic pain when her van was hit from behind by a big-rig truck in the California Heights neighborhood.
In her lawsuit, Leila Miyamoto, 43, said she had been fully stopped for at least a minute, waiting to make a left turn near Wardlow Road and Elm Avenue, when an 18-wheeler slammed into her minivan from behind. The 2016 wreck left her needing “numerous neck and back surgeries,” according to her attorneys.
After the crash, she and her 9-year-old son — who was in the van with her — filed a negligence lawsuit against Services Group of America, Inc., Food Services of America, Inc., driver Daniel Almazan, and Systems Services of America, Inc.
Defense attorneys maintained that Miyamoto made a sudden stop and did not use a turn signal, but on Monday, jurors found in her and her son’s favor. The panel concluded that Almazan acted negligently when his truck hit the van.
“The loaded truck weighing 37,000 pounds smashed into the rear of Leila Miyamoto’s van, totaling it and shattering the rear window,” her attorneys wrote in court filings.
The crash caused her head to hit the steering wheel and left her son fearing that his mother was dead, her attorneys wrote.
Miyamoto still has no recollection of the day of the collision or the days immediately before and after the crash, according to her lawyers.
Her attorneys described Miyamoto as a pillar of her family before the collision, organizing her family’s activities and home-schooling her children.
“Her injuries and limitations since the time of the collision have put significant strain on her marital relationship and have hindered her ability to care for her children in the way she did before the crash and her quest to get the medical care that she needs in order to restore as much of her pre-collision functionality as possible has been long and arduous,” they wrote in court papers.
One of Miyamoto’s attorneys, Nick Rowley, said the defense rejected a settlement offer of $6.9 million about seven years ago. They contended that Miyamoto had overstated the extent of her injuries.
“The jury saw through their attempts to distort the truth and delivered a powerful verdict for Leila, who has endured years of pain and hardship,” Rowley said in a statement.
City News Service, Long Beach Post editor Jeremiah Dobruck, and staff writer Jacob Sisneros contributed to this report.
View the entire article at Long Beach Post
In a landmark victory for justice, a Los Angeles jury awarded $34 million to Leila Miyamoto-Workman, a mother whose life was turned upside down when a Systems Services of America truck rear-ended her minivan, causing a traumatic brain injury and requiring multiple surgeries. The verdict, secured by Trial Lawyers for Justice, underscores the importance of holding corporations and insurance companies accountable for their negligence.
The accident occurred in 2016 at a Long Beach intersection while Miyamoto-Workman was waiting for left-turn traffic to clear. The impact was severe, leaving her with lasting physical and neurological injuries. However, instead of accepting responsibility, the defense attempted to blame Miyamoto-Workman, alleging that she had caused the accident by making a sudden stop.
The defense further downplayed the severity of her injuries, labeling them as exaggerated and attributing her medical care to attorney-driven influence rather than necessity. But Trial Lawyers for Justice knew the truth and fought tirelessly to expose these baseless claims.
Led by Nicholas Rowley, the legal team took on corporate insurers who, for nearly nine years, refused to settle fairly. The defense even went as far as conducting surveillance on Miyamoto-Workman, trying to discredit her injuries. But Rowley and his team turned this underhanded tactic against them—demonstrating the daily challenges she faced just to manage basic tasks.
“We did something unprecedented. We took the video surveillance and used it to our advantage, showing everything Leila had to go through just to get to the point where she could leave her house a couple of days per week,” said Rowley.
The jury saw through the frivolous defense strategies and recognized the true impact of the crash on Miyamoto-Workman’s life. Their decision awarded her $21 million, with additional augmentations bringing the total to $34 million. The message was clear: corporations and insurers cannot evade responsibility for the harm they cause.
“This was greedy, despicable insurance company behavior,” Rowley emphasized. “It ruined a 34-year-old mother’s life, and they refused to accept responsibility. But justice prevailed.”
This case is more than just a financial victory—it’s a triumph for all personal injury victims fighting against powerful insurance companies that refuse to take accountability. Trial Lawyers for Justice remains committed to ensuring that everyday people receive the justice they deserve, no matter how big or powerful the opposition.
For those facing similar struggles, you are not alone. If you or a loved one has suffered due to corporate negligence, Trial Lawyers for Justice is here to fight for you.
View the entire article at Daily Journal
A Los Angeles County jury has awarded $21.3 million in damages to a woman and her young son who were injured in 2016 when a tractor-trailer owned by a food distribution company slammed into the rear of their fully stopped minivan in Long Beach.
Leila Miyamoto of Long Beach sustained severe head trauma, a traumatic brain injury and chronic pain as a result of the crash, according to her attorneys, Trial Lawyers for Justice.
As a result of the jury verdict Monday, Feb. 10, the defendant, Phoenix-based Systems Services of America Inc., will be required to pay $13.2 million in costs and prejudgment interest, said Nini Wu, a spokesperson for Trial Lawyers for Justice.
The collision occurred July 18, 2016, near the intersection of East Wardlow Road and Elm Avenue in Long Beach.
Daniel Almazan was driving an 18-wheeler for Systems Services of America when he rear-ended the Toyota Sienna driven by 43-year-old Miyamoto. Her son, Jack, who was 9 years old at the time of the crash, was in the back seat.
According to Miyamoto, she had been stopped for about two minutes, waiting for traffic to clear so she could turn left when she was rear-ended by the tractor-trailer.
Miyamoto required the implantation of a spinal cord stimulator and has undergone multiple surgeries, including procedures on her neck, shoulders and lower back. Her attorneys said she also has grappled with significant emotional and psychological distress.
“It took a jury of 12 people out of the community to tell them, ‘You are 100% responsible for this,’ and Leila’s injuries are real,” said John Kawai, an attorney for Miyamoto.
During the trial, Systems Services of America’s attorneys argued Miyamoto’s injuries were less severe than she had claimed.
“The insurance companies involved in this case refused to fairly settle for eight-and-a-half years and threw many frivolous defenses at us,” said Keith Bruno, another attorney representing Miyamoto. “It didn’t work.”
Officials with Systems Services of America could not be reached for comment Tuesday to determine if the company intends to appeal the verdict.
View the entire article at Los Angeles Daily News
California Supreme Court
U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Iowa
Nevada
Clint Ehrlich is one of America’s foremost legal minds. He is a partner at Trial Lawyers for Justice, where he heads the firm’s nationwide appellate and insurance litigation practices. In that role, he acts as in-house appellate counsel for Nicholas Rowley and also handles select outside matters.
Clint has extensive experience in eight- and nine-figure civil litigation in state and federal courts, including the California Supreme Court, the California Court of Appeal, and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. His practice areas include personal injury, products liability, intellectual property, class actions, insurance bad faith, and employment law.
In many of his appeals, Clint has developed new legal doctrines that have shaped the course of future cases. He is one of the only lawyers who has been quoted directly by the California Supreme Court when formulating the law of the land. California’s standards for negligence – including the prohibition on considering case-specific facts in analyzing duty and the distinction between justification and proximate causation – are based directly on ideas Clint developed early in his legal career as a law student in the case of Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
In his pro bono work, Clint has taken on the FBI and freed an innocent man serving life in prison for murder. He spearheaded the exoneration of Sgt. Raymond Jennings, an Iraq war veteran who spent more than a decade behind bars for allegedly murdering a teenage girl. The case was featured on America’s Most Wanted and other national media before Clint persuaded the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office that they had prosecuted the wrong man.
Not just a lawyer, Clint is also an accomplished computer scientist. He holds a U.S. patent for the invention of advanced cryptographic networking protocols (US11151549B2), and he was appointed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s A.I. Committee by the Circuit’s Chief Judge. He previously served as a Principal Investigator for the U.S. National Science Foundation, which awarded him a quarter-million-dollar grant for his work adapting biological signaling theory to build fault-tolerant distributed systems.
Clint has become a leading voice on appellate law, insurance litigation, and the intersection of AI with legal practice. He has delivered keynote addresses and training seminars for major U.S. law firms and professional organizations, including the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers, Trial Lawyers University, and the Beverly Hills Bar Association. His television appearances have reached millions of viewers around the world, including major networks in the United States, Canada, Russia, the Middle East, and Asia.
Clint has been featured in the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, Foreign Policy, the BBC, NPR, and Dateline NBC. He was a Visiting Researcher in the Faculty of International Law at MGIMO University, Russia’s most elite academic institution, where he pursued dual PhDs in international law and nuclear game theory.
A man who suffered unnecessary penis injections has been awarded the biggest ever medical malpractice payout of $412 million.
Jurors had found that fraudulent and negligent conduct by defendants NuMale Medical Center, a men’s heath clinic operating in several states, resulted in irreversible damage to the plaintiff.
The man, now in his 70s, had sought treatment for fatigue and weight loss, but the clinic misdiagnosed him and unnecessarily treated him with “invasive erectile dysfunction,” shots, said attorneys who celebrated Monday’s verdict.
The lawyers said they are hopeful the giant payout will prevent other men from falling victim to a scheme that involved fraud and what they described as dangerous penile injections. They added that the punitive and compensatory damages total the largest amount to ever be awarded by a jury in a medical malpractice case in the U.S.
“It’s a national record-setting case and it’s righteous because I don’t think there’s any place for licensed professionals to be defrauding patients for money. That is a very egregious breach of their fiduciary duty,” said Lori Bencoe, one of the lawyers who represented the plaintiff.
“That’s breach of trust and anytime someone is wearing a white coat, they shouldn’t be allowed to do that.”
Newsweek has reached out to Bencoe Law via email for comment.
NuMale has clinics in Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. Newsweek has reached out to NuMale medical via email for comment.
The giant award follows a trial held in Albuquerque earlier this month which focused on allegations first outlined in a 2020 lawsuit.
Nick Rowley, one of the attorney’s on the plaintiff’s team said that the medical corporation set up a “fraudulent scheme to make millions off of conning old men.”
The plaintiff in this case was 66 when he visited the clinic in 2017.
Rowley said on social media that clinic workers had told patients they would have irreversible damage if they did not agree to injections three times per week.
Newsweek has reached out to The Rowley Law Firm for comment.
On their website, NuMale advertises multiple treatments for erectile dysfunction, including Trimix injections. Their website states that the injections are “typically compounded in specialized pharmacies, which means they are mixed according to a doctor’s prescription tailored to the needs of the patient
The medication is administered with an injection, where the patient uses a fine needle to inject the medication directly into the base or side of the penis.”
NuMale Medical Center President Brad Palubicki said in a statement sent Wednesday to The Associated Press that the company’s focus is on continuing to deliver responsible patient care while maintaining strict safety and compliance standards at all of its facilities.
“While we respect the judicial process, due to ongoing legal proceedings, we cannot comment on specific details of the case at this time,” he said.
This article includes reporting from The Associated Press.
View the entire article at Newsweek