Karen Zahka

Karen Zahka

Karen Zahka

Karen Zahka
BAR ADMISSIONS

Iowa
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
California
Nebraska

 

PREVIOUSLY ADMITTED PRO-HAC VICE

California
Indiana
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Ohio
South Dakota

EDUCATION

Suffolk University Law School
J.D. Juris Doctor

Boston University
– Bachelor of Science in Political Science / Psychology

Bio

Karen Zahka

Karen is a Partner at Trial Lawyers for Justice. She is an experienced and passionate trial lawyer. While she was born and raised in Massachusetts, Karen litigates and tries cases nationwide. She is currently admitted to practice in Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and California. She practices in other jurisdictions via pro hac vice.

Throughout her career, Karen has obtained numerous multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements, including but not limited to:

  • Nelsy Delgado Juarez v. Massachusetts General Hospital, et al.: In January 2025, Karen obtained an $11.9 million verdict (with interest) in Massachusetts for a 13-year-old girl with epilepsy who was overprescribed an anti-seizure medication, which caused her to suffer from Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and partial vision loss.
  • Christopher Dugan v. Tesla, et al.: In March 2024, Karen was trial counsel in a landmark $60.6 million verdict in Indiana against Tesla on behalf of a young father who suffered a permanent brain injury and partial foot amputation as a result of a Tesla employee’s negligence.
  • In September 2023, Karen obtained a record-setting $20 million settlement in New Hampshire for a client who was overprescribed a gout medication, which caused him to suffer from Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. This is reportedly the largest medical malpractice settlement against a private entity in the State of New Hampshire.
  • Andrea Larkin, et al. v. Dedham Medical Associates, et al.: Karen was trial counsel and secured an over $40 million verdict (with interest) for a 28-year-old woman who suffered a catastrophic stroke hours after labor and delivery of her daughter. Following this victory, Karen fought to defend and succeeded in defending the verdict from the insurance company’s attempt to overturn it on appeal.
  • Edward Xu v. Tufts Medical Center, et al.:  Karen obtained a $24.4 million verdict on behalf of a family whose newborn suffered from severe short bowel syndrome, which requires that he be tube fed for the rest of his life.
  • Estate of Joshua Messier v. Bridgewater State HospitalKaren obtained a $3 million settlement for a family whose 23-year-old disabled son was improperly restrained and killed by correction officers at a Massachusetts prison. This success resulted in sweeping systemic changes to improve the care and treatment of disabled individuals in state prison systems.
  • Estate of Zoe Rosenthal v. Charles J. Davignon, et al.: In April 2021, during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Karen was trial counsel on a $9.5 million verdict obtained on behalf of two daughters whose mother was negligently killed while walking her dog in a crosswalk near her home. According to the court clerk, this result set a record for a non-economic damages verdict for wrongful death with adult heirs in Western Massachusetts.
  • In June 2024, Karen obtained an additional $7.7 million for the Rosenthal family through pursuing insurance bad faith claims against the insurance companies for failure to settle the underlying case when liability and damages were reasonably clear.

While Karen is a zealous advocate for her clients, she is equally committed to supporting them on a personal level. She understands that most clients come to her during some of the most difficult times of their lives and ensures that every step of the legal process is explained clearly and candidly.

Karen received her undergraduate degree from Boston University, where she double majored in Political Science and Psychology. She then graduated from Suffolk University Law School, where she served as the Continuity Editing Assistant for The Journal of Health and Biomedical Law. She graduated from law school with Pro Bono Honors and was recognized for her time and commitment to volunteer legal services programs. Throughout law school, she not only worked full-time but also volunteered her nights and weekends with several non-profit programs dedicated to empowering survivors of domestic violence and assisting them in navigating the legal system to protect themselves and their loved ones.

Her professional accolades include:

  • Leader in the Law – Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (May 2025) for obtaining one of the top settlements in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2024.

  • Super Lawyers Rising Star (2016–present), awarded to a select number of attorneys under 40 based on peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • Excellence in the Law: Up & Coming Lawyer – Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (2022).

  • National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 Under 40 (2019).

In her spare time, you can find Karen soaking up as much live music as possible or exploring the outdoors.

Hospital shutoff oxygen leading to death

Hospital shutoff oxygen leading to death

It had been a rough week, but David Hackley’s family was looking forward to finally bringing him home.

Hackley, 77, was admitted on Jan. 2, 2020, to Gundersen Palmer Lutheran Hospital in West Union for pneumonia. A retired longtime West Union police chief, Hackley improved over the following week, and by Jan. 6, the hospital was making arrangements to discharge Hackley to a skilled nursing home for rehab before he was discharged to go home.

But early on the morning of Jan. 7, something went wrong. According to a lawsuit filed by Hackley’s family, a nurse reportedly tried to wake Hackley just after 7:30 a.m. and wrote later he was “difficult to rouse, does not respond to verbal stimuli, slow response to painful stimuli/sternal rub, color grey/ashen.” The problem, Hackley’s family alleges, is that at some point over that night, the oxygen machine feeding Hackley’s nasal tube was shut off.

Read the full article on the Des Moines Register here: https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2021/10/09/iowa-hospital-sued-shutting-off-patients-oxygen-supply-gundersen-palmer-lutheran/6004000001/

David Hackley, 77, of West Union died in January 2020. His wife and children have sued Gundersen Health System, claiming that the Gundersen's West Union hospital caused Hackley's death by turning off his supplemental oxygen while he was being treated for pneumonia.

Nation State of Play Podcast featuring Nicholas Rowley on California’s Regressive Malpractice Damages Cap

Nation State of Play Podcast featuring Nicholas Rowley on California’s Regressive Malpractice Damages Cap

Listen to the Podcast Here: https://anchor.fm/nation-state-of-play/episodes/Nick-Rowley—Californias-Regressive-Malpractice-Damages-Cap-e16d8tq

Jury Trial Lawyer, Nick Rowley, is featured on the Nation State and Play podcast to discuss the California medical malpractice cap (MICRA -1975 law) that caps the value of life at $250,000 regardless of the injury.

The 3rd leading cause of death in California is medical malpractice. MICRA is a one size fits all cap of $250,000 for anyone harmed by medical malpractice. MICRA was enacted with the understanding that the insurance industry would reduce insurance premiums. This is not the case. Insurance premiums increased and continue to increase today. This saves multi-billion dollar insurance companies money and costs American Citizens more money.

MICRA: the most regressive medical negligence law in US history. It has not changed since 1975. Eliminating MICRA would improve the State of California’s healthcare by holding medical professional accountable for their negligent work. Elimination would not cost medical professionals anything. It would cost multi-billion dollar medical malpractice insurance companies money when they pay out to injured individuals on the behalf of a negligent medical professional when this negligence causes harm.

How do we eliminate MICRA? Vote.

Nick is fighting to pass the Fairness for Injured Patient Act (FIPA). FIPA would raise the Med Mal cap in California to $1,200,000 to reflect inflation. FIPA would better help those who have been harmed by medical malpractice and are in need of financial assistance due to this harm.

FIPA also allows jurors and judges to be informed of the cap. If they decide an injured party deserves more than the cap, they can practice their civil right to award the plaintiff above more than the cap.

Holyoke woman’s family wins $9.5M judgment in crosswalk death

Holyoke woman’s family wins $9.5M judgment in crosswalk death

Preview included here, please visit the full published article at the Daily Hampshire Gazette:
https://www.gazettenet.com/Holyoke-family-awarded-$7-million-in-wrongful-death-suit-40155422

HOLYOKE — The family of a Holyoke woman killed in a crosswalk in 2017 after she was struck by a driver has been awarded over $7 million in a wrongful death suit.

The complete settlement, including compounded interest, is more than $9.5 million in the case of the late Zoe Rosenthal, a popular teacher with The Literacy Project.

Attorneys representing Rosenthal’s daughters, Tiffany and Chelsea Castillo, alleged the driver, Charles J. Davignon of Holyoke, then 63, was negligent when he made a left turn into the crosswalk, at the intersection of Lyman and Canal streets, on Nov. 27, 2017, and hit Rosenthal, who was 52 at the time.

In a statement, one of those attorneys, Charlotte Glinka, said “This has been a devastating loss to Zoe Rosenthal’s family and to the community of friends and colleagues who adored her.”

And Benjamin Novotny, another attorney, said in a phone call that though the jury award could not bring Zoe Rosenthal back, “It can help [her daughters] establish scholarships or other memorials in her name so that’s she’s not forgotten.”

The remainder of the article can be found here: https://www.gazettenet.com/Holyoke-family-awarded-$7-million-in-wrongful-death-suit-40155422

Additional articles referencing this case:

https://blog.cvn.com/9.5m-awarded-at-in-person-wrongful-death-trial-to-children-of-pedestrian-killed-in-crosswalk

https://www.legalreader.com/massachusetts-family-receives-7m-wrongful-death-settlement/

My Car Crash Is Causing Anxiety. What Should I Do?

My Car Crash Is Causing Anxiety. What Should I Do?

Any time you’re in a car crash with damage to yourself, your vehicle, and/or someone’s personal property, you’ll be placing a claim. If you’re responsible for that crash, your auto insurance company pays settlements to others and, most likely, repairs or replacement of your car. What if it’s not your fault? The same process applies. You file a claim against the other driver’s auto insurance.

You’ll be reimbursed for the cost to replace or repair your car. Your medical bills are covered by insurance. You can also get paid for the time you miss from work or school. Payments for your pain and suffering are also included in most settlements.

Things to Do at the Scene

After you’re in a vehicle crash, you or someone at the scene will call the police. You may not see a lot of damage to your car. It’s best to call the police and get a report started. The smallest amount of damage can be far costlier to repair than you might expect.

While you wait for police to arrive, take photos off the damage to any vehicles and personal property like fences and mailboxes. If you’re badly injured, you can usually get photos from the police later.

You should also ask to see a doctor. Again, you might feel fine, but shock after a crash often gets adrenaline racing. That adrenaline can mask pain. It’s best to be seen and learn there is nothing wrong than discover you have serious injuries hours later.

The Crash Investigation

Police will do their investigation and issue a police report. The insurance company will also investigate. They will look at the damage to your car, the crash scene, your medical reports and bills, the police report, witness statements, and the crash location.

In addition to those pieces of evidence that are used to determine the settlement amount, the insurance company often consults with crash reconstruction experts and engineers who can determine if road conditions or malfunctions in a vehicle were partially or fully to blame.

An appraisal of your car’s value is calculated. The value may be based on the cost to repair the car to its state prior to the crash or the Kelley Blue Book value at the time of the crash. The question for the insurer is if it’s cheaper to repair or replace your car.

If you’re going to have to replace your car or get it repaired, you’ll likely need a rental car in the interim. The cost of a rental car may also be part of the insurance claim.

Finally, the insurance company will find out how much time you had to miss. If you needed a week of rest after a head injury and missed five days of work, that will be considered. If you missed a day of college classes, the cost of the classes is also tallied.

The Settlement

When the insurance company has looked over all the evidence, you’ll often be offered a settlement. If you accept it, you’ll be asked to sign paperwork releasing the driver and insurance company from future claims.

What happens next depends on the actual ownership of your car. If you hold the title, you’ll have to turn that over to the insurance company if the car was declared a total loss. You receive your payout when you present the title. After that, you’ll be rushed to use that money to get a replacement car.

If the car is being repaired, the insurance company may pay the mechanic directly. If you were able to drive your car after the crash, you may get the check and have it repaired at your convenience.

If there was still an active loan or lease on the car, the financial institution is part of the process. If the car is being repaired, the repairs have to be made, so you’ll never see the money. If the car was totaled, the insurance payoff is given to the bank to pay back the remainder of the loan or lease.

Is the Settlement Offer Ideal?

Sometimes, it’s not to your advantage to deal directly with the insurance company. Don’t rush to get the money. It may not be the best offer in your situation.

You could have injuries that require years of medical care. Traumatic injuries can lead to PTSD that requires months and even years of counseling. The amount you’re offered in the settlement may not be enough to really replace the car you’ve just lost. This is when you need to talk to a law firm that specializes in personal injury lawsuits.

Isn’t it in your best interest to talk to a trial lawyer? Remember that another driver’s auto insurance company is working for the other driver. You may be offered a fair car crash settlement, but it’s not always the case. Insurance companies may offer a low-ball settlement to see if you’ll take it.

A free consultation with a personal injury lawyer helps you be certain the settlement is in your best interest. Talk to the experienced legal team at TL4J to be sure you’re getting the full compensation you deserve.