Nick Rowley Announces $45 Million Settlement In Car Crash Case

Nick Rowley Announces $45 Million Settlement In Car Crash Case

The Los Angeles based personal injury law firm Carpenter, Zuckerman, & Rowley (CZR) announces a $45 million settlement in a disputed liability car crash case against an insurance company.  The case was handled by CZR Trial Lawyer Nick Rowley as well as attorney and partner Robert Ounjian and special projects director Steve Glass.

The case involved a disputed liability car crash in which CZR represented a 21-year old mother and her two children, ages 2 and 4, who were involved in a rear-end collision in San Bernardino County.    Liability in the case was disputed because their vehicle was stopped on Haven Avenue, in an area nearby Ontario Airport, where vehicles are not permitted to stop.

The defendant claimed he swerved to try and avoid the collision, but could not stop in time.  The police report listed both drivers at fault.  The crash resulted in serious injuries to the 4 year old child.

“Many law firms would take on a case like this, and settle it for maybe $250,000 or $500,000 and remain within the insurance policy limits and avoid trial,” said Nick Rowley, lead trial lawyer on the case.  “At CZR, we are trail lawyers seeking justice for our clients and are not afraid to take a case all the way to trial.”

“When a client is seriously injured, has life-long medical expenses, and their life is changed forever, insurance companies should award those individuals fair compensation.  That is what we saw in this case, where the insurance company finally stepped up and did the right thing for our client and her children,” Rowley went on to say.

Attorney Nick Rowley Wins $6.5 Million For Client In Nightclub Assault

Attorney Nick Rowley Wins $6.5 Million For Client In Nightclub Assault

SAN DIEGO, August 7, 2017— Attorney Nick Rowley, partner at the law firm of Carpenter, Zuckerman, & Rowley and founder of Trial Lawyers for Justice, announces a verdict of $6.5 million for client Lisa Lopez as a result of an assault and blindness caused by negligent security and reckless conduct by shirtless bartenders at a popular San Diego nightclub who watched and laughed at the attack.  Rich’s nightclub and XL Staffing security destroyed evidence of the video footage which showed the assault and the Superior Court of San Diego instructed the jury on the destruction of evidence.

On December 21, 2012, Lisa Lopez was a patron at Rich’s Nightclub in San Diego, with her best friend’s husband, Charles Burris, and others.  Charles met another friend, Sandra Beyl, an ex-girlfriend, at the club.  Later in the evening, a verbal confrontation began between Sandra and Charles. The altercation then became physical and lasted for five to ten minutes while nearby bartenders laughed and nightclub security did nothing to intervene to diffuse the situation as San Diego permit required them to do.

Hoping to diffuse the argument, Lisa approached Sandra and Charles and encouraged them to stop arguing when without warning, Sandra smashed a beer bottle onto Lisa’s forehead and eye, resulting in significant facial lacerations, severe damage, and vision loss to her right eye.  Neither the bar or security called the police or an ambulance despite having detained and handcuffed Sandra Beyl, who was intoxicated and over-served.

“The employees at the nightclub behind the bar who were shirtless decided to laugh and serve more alcohol instead of stopping the violence, and the security staff whose sole job is to protect patrons at the club chose to do nothing to diffuse this situation which lasted 5-10 minutes before Lisa intervened.  Then the Defendants destroyed the video footage,” said Nick Rowley.  “Despite the customer having a bottle shattered on her face and bleeding profusely, the club did not skip a beat or stop the music and instead decided to continue the party and keep selling alcohol.  This was a case of profit over safety.”

“The jury, in this case, realized the fault of club employees and understood the importance of protecting people from violence rather than doing nothing or egging it on with laughter.  They also clearly understood the severe impact this event had on Lisa’s life,” Rowley went on to say.

The jury awarded $2.5 million for past non-economic losses and $4.0 million for future non-economic losses, resulting in a total verdict of $6.5 million.  The top offer from the defense was $75,000 prior to trial.  Then during the trial, the offer increased to $400,000.

“This verdict will help Lisa deal with the loss that resulted from the gross negligence of nightclub and security staff employees, but she will never be the same as she was prior to this incident,” said Rowley.

The trial team for Ms. Lopez consisted of Theresa Bowen, Haytham Faraj, and Nicholas Rowley.

The California law firm of Carpenter, Zuckerman, & Rowley has over 100 employees dedicated to fighting for the rights of the injured.  

With offices in Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, and California, and offering legal services from coast to coast, Trial Lawyers for Justice specializes in personal injury law. 

Both firms are dedicated to helping clients recover the compensation they deserve for their injuries. For more information, or to schedule a consultation regarding your case, visit www.czrlaw.com or www.tl4j.com today.

Case Number 37-2013-00080607-CU-PO-CTL

TL4J Medical Malpractice Verdict Upheld Against Mayo Clinic Health System and Winneshiek Medical Center

TL4J Medical Malpractice Verdict Upheld Against Mayo Clinic Health System and Winneshiek Medical Center

On June 15, 2017, an Iowa District Court judge upheld a Winneshiek County Jury’s unanimous verdict in a medical malpractice claim in favor of Patricia Moore and against Defendant Mayo Clinic Health System-Decorah and Defendant Winneshiek Medical Center.  The Winneshiek Medical Center was determined to be 67% at fault, and the Mayo Clinic Health System-Decorah was determined to be 33% at fault.  The jury awarded Patricia $400,000.00.  $150,000 for past pain and suffering and $250,000 for future pain and suffering.  The District Court entered judgment against the Defendant Winneshiek Medical Center and in favor of Patricia in the amount of $268,000.00 and entered judgment against Defendant Mayo Health Clinic Systems, Decorah and in favor of Patricia in the amount of $132,000.00.

Patricia was represented at trial by Trial Lawyers for Justice attorneys Dominic Pechota and Rod Ritner.  At trial, it was established that on April 11, 2011, Patricia Moore presented at the Winneshiek Medical Center in Decorah, Iowa complaining of sharp grimacing pain in her left chest and back.  Patricia was seen by emergency room physician Dr. Kent Svestka, an employee of Mayo Clinic Health System-Decorah Clinic.  Dr. Svestka ultimately ordered a CT with contrast to rule out an aortic dissection. Patricia told multiple healthcare professionals on that day that she was allergic to contrast dye.  Patricia’s chart on April 11, 2011 reflected that she had a contrast dye allergy, and her past hospital records, available electronically, also reflected that she had a contrast dye allergy.  In fact, on two prior occasions, (one only two months prior) Dr. Svestka had treated Patricia, and he documented both times that Patricia had a history of contrast dye allergy.

On the way to the CT, Patricia informed the technician, an employee of the Defendant Winneshiek Medical Center, that she was allergic to contrast dye.  The technician administered contrast dye anyway.  Because the CT contrast dye was improperly ordered and administered, Patricia had an anaphylactic reaction and suffered a cardiac arrest.  Although Patricia was able to return to work full time, she continues to experience pain and suffering as a result of the Defendants’ negligence.

Plaintiff’s liability expert Dr. Stephen Scheckel, established that Dr. Svestka was required to, but failed to ascertain whether Patricia had a contrast dye allergy before ordering a CT with contrast.  Dr. Scheckel also established that Dr. Svestka did not conduct an appropriate physical exam or perform necessary testing before ordering the CT exam with contrast, and that a CT exam was not indicated even if Patricia was not allergic to contrast dye.  Dr. Scheckel is Medical Director of Emergency Room at Mercy Hospital in Iowa City.

Defense expert Dr. Edward Mlinek, an emergency room physician from Lincoln, Nebraska, testified that Dr. Svestka was not responsible for ascertaining whether Patricia had an allergy to contrast because the hospital had a system in place to learn of such allergies.  Dr. Scheckel established, however, even had there been a safety net in place and others are to double check, the physician remains responsible because the physician is the one that ordered the medicine and is the one that has the highest level of training.

Dr. Scheckel also established that a CT tech that knows that it is even possible that a patient has an allergy to CT contrast should not proceed with the CT, but instead should contact the ordering physician and inform them of the possible allergy so that the ordering physician can decide how to proceed.  When there is a reported allergy from any source, it is a breach of the standard of care for a CT tech to administer contrast.  It is not within the scope of practice for a CT tech to make the final decision about giving something that can be life threatening.  The jury rejected the testimony of Dr. Milnek who testified that it was acceptable for the CT tech to have administered contrast even after learning of a possible history of allergic reaction to contrast.

Defendant Mayo Clinic Health System-Decorah did not offer any money before trial.  The highest offer of Defendant Winneshiek Medical Center was $25,000.00.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Decorah was represented at trial by Gregory Karpenko with Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. from Minneapolis, Minnesota and Christine Conover, with Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman PLC in Cedar Rapids.  Winneshiek Medical Center was represented by Timothy Boller with Weilein & Boller P.C. from Waterloo.

This verdict in the Moore case follows a record $1,188,735 jury verdict from January 2016 that was obtained by Mr. Pechota and Mr. Ritner in a Winneshiek County case involving a collision between a motorcycle and a car.

Nick Rowley To Be Guest Speaker At “Take Back the Courtroom IV” in Miami, Florida

Nick Rowley To Be Guest Speaker At “Take Back the Courtroom IV” in Miami, Florida

Trial Guides is proud to announce the fourth Take Back the Courtroom CLE event. This two-day, intensive CLE brings together three of America’s greatest trial lawyers: Rick Friedman, Roger Dodd, and Randi McGinn (plus guest speakers Nicholas Rowley and Keith Mitnik). They will teach you all of the skills necessary to win even the most difficult trials.

This event will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day. The cost varies based on your level of experience:

  • $1,200 per person for those lawyers who have practiced for more than five years.
  • $600 per person for those who have practiced less than five years if they are registered with Trial Guides’ New Lawyers Program.

On Friday, May 19, there will be a reception from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. Both evenings will feature a guest speaker from 7:00 – 9:00 p.m.. These two sessions are optional, although they are included in the event price.

PLEASE NOTE: This event is open only to civil plaintiff’s OR criminal defense counsel. Lawyers who perform any work on behalf of insurance companies or any form of civil defense work are not allowed to attend. All attendees will be required to sign an affidavit to that effect before being allowed entry. No audio or video recording is allowed.

You will have access to five trial legends at this event – lawyers who try cases every year and who continue to obtain exceptional results.  This is an event you don’t want to miss.

Topics will include:

  • Working with difficult judges
  • Dealing with difficult opponents
  • Handling difficult cases
  • Preparing difficult clients for depositions
  • Preparing difficult clients for direct and cross-examination at trial
  • How to make tough decisions at trial
  • How to deal with new venues and new judges
  • Demonstrative evidence
  • Changing trends in voir dire
  • And much more

Attorney Nick Rowley Wins $1.5 Million Slip and Fall Verdict Against Costco

Attorney Nick Rowley Wins $1.5 Million Slip and Fall Verdict Against Costco

LOS ANGELES, May 8, 2017—Attorney Nick Rowley of Trial Lawyers for Justice and Carpenter, Zuckerman, & Rowley recently stepped in and took a difficult slip and fall case to trial in Santa Monica, California for client Brenda when her trial attorney fell ill and was hospitalized.

Brenda tripped over a variable height curb in a Costco parking lot and suffered two quadriceps tendon tears. She required surgery and was forced to spend 90 days in a rehab treatment facility.

“Brenda faced a number of challenges in this case, including the fact that no other Costco customers had slipped or tripped over the curb. Also, the defense argued that Brenda had recovered well and had no residual injuries,” Rowley says. “Costco was unwilling to make any type of offer, not even a penny, to Brenda, which is why this case ended up in court.”

Mr. Rowley made the risky decision to try the case as an expedited jury trial, which is heard in front of a smaller jury, has no right of appeal, and must be completed in just a few days. Instead of calling medical experts or Brenda’s healthcare providers to the stand, Mr. Rowley only called Brenda who he believed would be able to best tell her story of injuries and damages. Despite only being introduced to the case at 8pm the night before trial, Mr. Rowley managed to win a $1.5 million non-economic damages verdict against the defendant, Costco. This is a record setting victory for an expedited jury trial on a slip and fall with this type of injury.

“The jury had the option of finding Brenda partially or fully liable for her injuries, but they determined that Costco was 100% negligent and liable instead,” Rowley states. “I took a chance by not calling medical experts or doctors to the stand to testify, because I believed that simplifying this case and focusing on the power of the truth of the human story was what the jury needed most. It was a great honor to be able to step in as Brenda’s trial lawyer. Trying cases for good deserving people is what I do. And, because of Brenda’s courage, Costco redesigned and made the walkway safe.”

With offices in Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, and California, and offering legal services from coast to coast, Trial Lawyers for Justice specializes in personal injury law. Trial Lawyers for Justice is dedicated to helping clients recover the compensation they deserve for their injuries. 

Attorney Nick Rowley to Speak at the American Association for Justice “Rules of the Road For Doctors, Drugs, and Devices” Seminar

Attorney Nick Rowley to Speak at the American Association for Justice “Rules of the Road For Doctors, Drugs, and Devices” Seminar

DES MOINES, IowaMarch 30, 2017  — Attorney Nick Rowley of Trial Lawyers for Justice will speak at the American Association for Justice (AAJ) “Rules of the Road For Doctors, Drugs, and Devices” seminar at the Fairmont Mission Inn and Spa in Sonoma, California on April 7-8, 2017. Mr. Rowley will be discussing how attorneys can forge and maintain a bond with everyone in the courtroom, including the client, witnesses, members of the jury, and judge.

The “Rules of the Road” seminar is based on a book by Patrick Malone and Rick Friedman that discusses how trial attorneys can prove liability. The event will feature a number of other highly respected speakers, including Shanin Specter, who will talk about what works and what doesn’t in jury cases, and Zoe Littlepage, who will discuss research on persuading conservative jurors. Attendees will also have a chance to network with other legal professionals and discuss their current cases in group brainstorming sessions. The event will wrap up on Saturday afternoon so attendees can spend the rest of the day enjoying wine country.

“The goal of the ‘Rules of the Road’ program is to provide trial attorneys with the knowledge they need to win eight or nine figure verdicts for their clients,” Rowley states. “It is an honor to speak at this event in front of my colleagues who are just as eager to seek justice for their clients as I am.”

Original article previously published courtesy of https://kwwl.com/